So
We have arrived at a particular point in time where because of the path we took to get here, intellectually and ontologically, we have a situation where no one is willing to discuss what is actually happening and what can be done about it. We can discuss what has happened before, we can discuss what we think might happen later. We can discuss, in very sterile and hypothetical terms, what we think maybe should happen in a parallel timeline that looks just like this one, but the moment we start talking about what's actually happening, people start quietly exiting stage right or stage left depending on their personal political proclivity.
I want to cut to the chase. I hate this prevarication, but I can't because it clears the room. So we have to recalibrate our sensibilities a little bit, and to do that, we are going to roll the clock back. This puts us one year before the conflagration that would inevitably consume the aristocracy of the South and bring progressivism to the fore at the expense of Personal Liberty and State Autonomy. Whatever you may think, whatever you may believe, the primary reason for the American Civil War was that the Monroe Doctrine cannot be enforced unless there is complete unity and continuity in both Identity and Culture of the governing Elite in the United States. There were two substantial barriers to a totalizing Monroe Doctrine: Mexico, and the South. In the 19th century, both of these factors were eliminated. The destruction of Mexico as a sovereign entity was the precedent & predicate for the destruction of the South as a crypto-sovereign entity.
The fact that slavery wasn't the focus, wasn't primary, wasn't even high on the list of motivations for the actual warfighters, is one of those casually known and widely understood things that can still be used to destroy careers or get people hit in the face with a can of Twisted Tea by the patrons of the descendants of those who enslaved themselves. It seems to dodge the minds and hearts of the people who need to internalize it most, but slavery was so much bigger than one country, one group, one race, one single period of time. There are more slaves now than there have ever been at any point in history, and that's not because slavery is popular, but because there are so many more people now than there have ever been at any one point in history. All of those people, with very rare exception, are the descendants of slaves.
The North did not want to get rid of slavery because it made the South economically viable. The North wanted to get rid of the South because it had internal coherency completely separate from the Puritan Idiolectual Regime that dominated the North. The Confederacy was the third largest economy in the world for those brief moments before they pivoted to a war economy. Even after Sherman1 performed the ritual destruction of Southern Economic Sovereignty, it was still a prize for anyone that could control it. In fact, this is true of every sub-region of North America in some way. Both Canada and Mexico are challenging properties, but they each have much to recommend them. Still and all, the South is the crown jewel of North American sub-regions. If you wave a magic wand to get rid of Puritans and Whigs, the South and North being distinct countries is completely viable. Indeed, it would hamstring any kind of globally dominating Empire for much longer. Both the countries would either have learned to work together, slowly meld through time & intermarriage & economy, or eventually line up the rest of the world on opposing sides to settle the matter.
Progressive Globalism has conquered the world, and it started with by conquering the South. This was the goal from the very beginning; anti-slavery was just a fun little party favor that ended up becoming a collector's item many generations later. After the South was brought to heel, Progressive Globalists continued to ramp their efforts externally even as they bred an army, and an ideology, internally. When the opportunity to destroy Traditional Monarchy in Europe arose, Progressive Globalism was there with rhetoric, war bonds, deleterious loans, and, soon enough, the bodies of young White men to throw on the fire. It would again be ready to leverage everything it had 20 years later when it destroyed the last gasp of European independence and identity distinct from Progressive Globalism. And that is the paradigmatic regime we have come to expect as the baseline. The Russian version of Progressive Globalism was never going to be allowed to dominate or grow because it had too much nationalism and ethnic identity hiding under the surface. The progressive globalists in America tried to use Russia as a lab for their homogenizing communism, and that's where they learned that it wasn't quite ready for field testing2.
There are many more conflicts that illustrate it, but the three Wars of Progressive Aggression, the American Civil War, the European Great War, and the Global Trade War, are indicative of exactly what Progressive Globalism is willing and able to do to its enemies if they dare to get in the way. We are going to look at each one from a very high level and smooth out a lot of the edges and contours that are not only important to know but fulfilling to discover by both sight and touch. This is by necessity minimizing; just know that the author is very aware of what's being lost in transliteration. There is so much more than what is on this page regarding these conflicts.
The brutal and disgusting capacity of Progressive Globalism is on display in each conflict, but each one also highlights a certain tendency that became more refined and devastating over time. In the American civil War, you see the willingness to annihilate kin and ruin the thing you state is your reason for action. Not only were they willing to genocide Southerners, they were happy to fill the North with contemptible Irish, ruin the productive capacity of the South, and unleash cantankerous and slovenly former slaves on the entire country3. Of course, the Progressive Globalists extended their hands in friendship and reunion to the surviving Warriors even as they passed laws and instantiated amendments to make sure they could be strangled and destroyed if they ever put a toe over the line again. And don't think for one second that they accidentally tarnished the identity and reputation of their foe. Progressive Globalism has a Vatican, and it is in Massachusetts4. Even before the war was over, they were making plans for how to tar and feather the South, Southerners, and Southernness in the future5. You can see this every time some asian speaking American English starts to prattle on about General Grant or Tecumseh Sherman or some other damn thing they have absolutely no business discussing.
In World War I, or the First War of Progressive Globalist Aggression, you see many of the elements of the American Civil War, but magnified and reconfigured to the relevant regions and era. Something like half of all the deaths in the American Civil War are attributed to sickness, uncleanliness, and sanitation factors. While these numbers are also high in the Great War, the lion's share of butchers bill goes to artillery6. You are seeing a taste of how this happens right now in Ukraine, though we should thank Nature's God that it appears to be going back towards a war of movement7. War of Attrition is a disgusting and feminine proclivity of States who hate their own people but lack the wherewithal and fortitude to do anything concrete about it. Feeding male youth into the trenches to be chewed up and spit out has to be the most spinster thing imaginable. Trench warfare served the purposes of the Entente beautifully. Ask anyone what World War I was about, and they will mumble something about Gavrilo Princip8 and maybe something else about fait accompli9. This institutional ignorance goes all the way up the stack to postgraduate studies on the topic10.
I will let you in on a little secret: for the Central Powers, the purpose of World War I was to keep Europe a European place, by which I mean keep Monarchy ensconced as the governance methodology, and to keep the natural layering of society in place. For the Entente, the purpose of World War I was to kill off the aristocrats that were not on board with Progressive Globalism as well as trim the herd of the nationalistic and religious within the commoner class. You can see the truth of this in how each side built and maintained its trenches11. Once the death toll got to a certain level, Progressive Vatican gave the OK, and America joined in to decisively end the conflict. The bodies of European Monarchists and Christians were requisite fertilizer for the tilling of European soil for the seeds of communism12.
At first, the focus remained on Weimar Germany. It had all of the requisite sex perversion and disgusting pagan tendency to become a bastion of self-annihilation in the heart of Europe. Unfortunately, a humble Austrian painter made sure that that wasn't going to happen13. So the pivot to Moscow and the descendants of bolshevism became the point & purpose of intellectual and financial efforts of the Progressive Globalists. Yet again, they were stymied, this time by a brutal sociopath with nationalist characteristics14. Their earnest hope was for Trotsky to be given control of the country and duplicate the Holodomor as many times as needed to wipe out the last vestiges of Aristocracy and Faith, but somehow Stalin's purges spared Russia from the Cambodian Path15.
It would have taken multiple decades for Russia to recover from what communism had done to it, and while he was able to save the country from going much further down the purity spiral, Stalin was not a good man nor was he a good leader; merely a Great Man for his brutality and distilled coldness. This can save your country from annihilation, but it's not anything worth building on without the three M's16. So Stalin saved his country from auto-annihilation but lined it up for external annihilation. Imagine a world where Hitler teams up with Churchill to save Europe from Russia. That may sound insane to you, but it is just as possible as the American communist colony of the USSR breaking away from its Master then pivoting into an alliance that they would eventually pretend didn't exist. Counterfactuals are in art that not many can practice well, but the mid-20th century ground is fertile for lots of entertaining what-ifs.
Both Stalin and Hitler were a threat to what FDR was trying to build. He had to decide which one was the bigger threat, and he chose Hitler because Stalin was merely the guy that hijacked what he (FDR) and his friends had created, and he wasn't going to live forever anyways (no one does). The stark reality, the one that will remain unspeakable until the boomers have died off completely and any level of true objectivity can be applied to what is commonly referred to as World War II, is that the USSR was going to play ball with Progressive Globalism and National socialist Germany was not.
That is why World War II happened.
Of course, Stalin was a wild card in this regard, again being a sociopath with nationalistic tendencies, and he had already purged out the adherence to America's crypto-communist structure, but he had not made any move to supplant the Harvard Lexicon, and despite what you may have heard, vocabulary is a superweapon in culture wars.
The Cold War was an expansive disagreement on what type of globalism should be deployed to benefit which type of progressive. That was the only question in contention. On both sides, Russian communism and American communism, the concepts of nuclear exchange and Total War were used to occupy the nationalists as the progressives consolidated cultural control. By keeping these patriotic hot heads focused on each other as threats, both groups were supplanted from the real seats of power so that globalism could proceed apace17. The biggest threat to globalist structure is the Right Wing, and the Occidental Right Wing was murdered by the Nuremberg Trials. The reason we are seeing the Managerial Elite, which are the stewards of the Progressive Globalist Empire, chinp out in such shambolic fashion these days is the resurrection of the true Right Wing across the Occident. Even with low quality midwives like Trump, Orban, and Putin18, the rebirth of the Right Wing is happening in breach, and the first true Right Wing leaders are starting to assert themselves. Bukele is the first, he will not be the last.
The one thing that has probably saved us from a global purity spiral in the style of the Cambodian Autogenocide is in fact the twin victories of Diversityism and Feminism19. Had these two cancers been left to fester in the background for another few generations, they would have utterly destroyed every culture they infected. But because the Boomers allowed them to colonize the national-cultural body so quickly, they have consumed massive amounts of institutional credibility and institutional capacity. This is precisely why the mustard seed of the true Right Wing has begun to sprout. Without the fertilizer of the decay of pet minorities and shrews in power, there is a chance that the Right Wing would never have been reborn. All's well that ends well I guess.
Unfortunately for us and our children, it's not so simple as I have portrayed it. If you want to see what the near future of conflict is going to look like, pay close attention to the initiation, progression, and prosecution of the Russo-Ukrainian War. I have not made it a secret as to where my preferences lie, but I also think Russia has suffered greatly precisely because their nationalism is infected with European Liberalism. Were someone like Bukele in power in Russia, I think it would be a very different story. But the globalist cat’s paw exemplified by Zelensky is the archetype for the various leaders who will be deployed to consume anyone with patriotic or nationalist tendencies in the profusion of Occidental Brush Wars that are just around the corner.
The shameless brutality displayed by Progressive Globalism in the three wars previously discussed are all coming to a refined maturity in the RUW. The last thing Progressive Globalists want are short, definitive wars. They prefer long drawn out conflicts with totalizing conclusions that reduce the populations of troublesome demographics definitively. Smart leaders who care about their people and countries do not effect extended trench warfare that requires destruction of economy and demography. While they have blundered and failed to Grasp The Nettle, just like Imperial Germany, Moscow has prosecuted the war with the primacy of Nation and Population at the forefront. The Liberal Occupation Government of Ukraine... not so much. They have happily torched their population in an autogenocide on track to replicate the Cambodian Cataclysm. This will be the pattern going forward.
...sheesh! We have wandered far afield from where I originally intended to go. Having read through this a few times, for editing as well as other reasons, I see now that there is no way to elegantly to wend our way back to where I intended. So I am just going to do a Hard Right turn, and I don't expect this to make sense.
If you can read, if you read history, if you can read history with both objectivity and subjectivity populating both of your eyes, then you know that the necessities of the moment have no bearing on the inevitability of outcomes, or conclusion in some cases. Here is a term that you won't hear in a lot of places but you owe it to yourselves to become familiar with:
Ultra Violence
This is where disagreements with no peaceful resolution end up. This is where we are headed towards because at no point will the better angels of our nature or cooler heads prevail. If you are having a hard time with this term, here is the simple math:
At no point in history has an internal disagreement with no reasonable compromise ever ended with both sides deciding to step back from the line of force. Once violence is on the table, ultra violence is the only option for the winner. The side that is willing to accelerate far past beyond reasonable or acceptable will always be the side that dictates what was reasonable and/or acceptable in retrospect.
I'm not advocating anything, because I'm not allowed to advocate for anything. I'm not encouraging anything, because encouragement is a sin. I am merely stating that, when the lights go out or the chips are down or we are at the end of the day, those that are ready, willing, and able to push it to 11 for no discernible reason will always dictate to those that cannot conceive of a reason to be "extra ."
Make of this what you will.
Spit on his name, forever
Too many jews spoil the plot
Though, of course, that little plan took longer once their hijinks during reconstruction were identified and halted by one of the last generations with organic Common Sense
It's Harvard, and one day we will roll tanks on its yard. Believe that
I know this is a little thing, but it galls me no end: isn't it strange how anytime an American entertainer wants to portray a dumb person, they use a "Southern" accent? Have you ever noticed how if you mimic black patois you are racist, but if you ape Southern patois you're being funny? In America, at all times and in all places, it is absolutely acceptable to mock the South. There is no exception to this. It is disgusting, and if you read this footnote, you are now put on notice and thusly no longer allowed to pretend it's not happening.
Bitches do the most damage, ah swear
For now
Lmao they won't say that name but they will reference him obliquely
They won't use that term, of course. Who would?
I'm not going to say this is axiomatic, but if you ever find a person that is able to discuss World War I with nuance and deference, hold on to that person, I guarantee they are a net benefit to your your life
Enjoy those bitter redpills shape rotators
It was a complete shock that those seeds first sprouted in Russia. lmao
You can hate him all you like, but you will also always find common cause with Communists, and that alone should give you pause
Stalin saved Russia, and I will never be comfortable with this fact, yet fact it remains
It rhymes
Subscribe to my Substack and maybe I will tell you the secret... but only if you send pizza rolls to my web zone
If you take nothing away from this diatribe, internalize this statement
Each of them nationalists infected with congenital liberalism
Laugh unendingly at this ugly poetry because it does in fact rhyme