To Kill A Scared Cow

The One Hit Wonder-Women of Postmodern Mythology

In 2015, the book Go Set A Watchman was released by Harper Collins to much fanfare, heightened expectations, and, eventually, mixed reception. The final years before the dawning of the Trump Era often seem, to me, a sort of “Spanish Civil War,” a dress rehearsal for the massive conflict just around the corner. Leftists were slower to salt the earth, and Rightists were still trapped within the George Bush cultural identity. One of the many gifts the political rise of Trump has given Americans is the latitude to challenge the foundational myths of our society from any angle and era. Prior to his annihilation of the presumption of “polite discourse,” it was way out of bounds to criticize the Sacred Heifers of Society. He grabbed that concept by the pussy and chucked it into the rubbish bin of history. Every year, every season, maybe every other week, we seem to identify another Ba’al statue, another golden calf, another talisman of the forever dead 20th century “postmodern” memeplex, and, so long as the delivery is eloquent and amusing, the dissolution begins.

One of those sacred heifers is the feisty & lovable Scout, a mouthy little shrew from the satirical fiction book To Kill A Mockingbird (TKAM). Scout is a rhetorical construct that is used to engender willing assumption of the identity free & forever apologizing caricature expected of all White Americans; the Ethnos Rasa. She is a normal little girl who is afflicted with Congenital Southerness, but makes great strides nonetheless to deify negros, defer to cripples, and point a recriminatory finger at all Whites for the terrible injustice of… unfaithful wives being deceitful. TKAM is a pretty OK book, good for a single read, and an interesting, if uncommon, perspective held by a miniscule number of Southerners in 1960. In a sane world, it would be a fun little gem that gets shared at book clubs attended by women with big hair south of the Mason Dixon Line.

In our world, it was an overnight success that went into cinema production almost immediately. Soon after, it was force fed to all public school students around the country, and still is to this day. TKAM is a sacred text in the foundational myth of Racism as Original Sin, and is often the catalyst for the seeds of negrolatry planted all throughout childhood to sprout in the White heart. Because Nature has a God and Data Is Racist, the progressive religion relies on fiction for the vast majority of its scriptural components, and TKAM is one of those nuggets of fiction that is repetitively portrayed as “basically fact” until people just assume it’s a true story. Of course, when asked explicitly, they will say it’s fiction, but if you ask which parts are fake or inaccurate, you receive blank stares and nervous shrugs.

Harper Lee, the alleged author of TKAM, has no literary contribution after. The book released in 2015 was a first draft of TKAM, submitted to an editor¹ and returned with extensive notes and guidance which contributed directly to TKAM in its final form. I say alleged because it’s funny to be glib about the holy books of a religion I have no respect for, but it seems likely that Lee did write the book². The commercial success has nothing to do with her prose, indeed the movie has had stronger wings due to the precipitous decline in applied literacy in general, which may or may not be a bad thing. The book is important because it is sanctified, a worshipful tribute to a fairytale world where reasonable White men with law degrees do the right thing to protect physically incapable negros from the angst & ire of dipshit rednecks, with substantial guidance from single White women and the developmentally disabled, of course.

Harper Lee is just one entry in the long list of One Hit Wonder-women. The Liberal Occupation Government in the US relies on these fantastical narratives in combination with its firm belief in the Primacy of Exceptions, a concept that requires a short diversion:

If you refuse to click YouTube links, I don’t blame you. If you think The Office is Hollywood drivel that gets way too much credit, I can’t fault your position. The relevant quote is this:

“[The] Employees of this office are small and delicate, they deserve protection from local pervs. Better a thousand innocent men are locked up than one guilty man roam free.”

This line is intended to signal where you are supposed to stand vis a vis crime & punishment³. The collective West has labored under the delusion that exceptions drive logic, consistency, and fairness in applied justice for decades, and this mass delusion was constructed over the previous centuries. We now take it as a matter of course that law codes are a massive collection of unreadable ephemera requiring legions of lawyers to be our sacred oracles as we prostrate ourselves before deified numbskulls in polyester robes as they dictate the deeper truths of completely bonkers concepts like “the average person” or “reasonable force” or “equality under the law.” Part and parcel of this torturous charade is the undeniable fact that laws, enforcement, and sociocultural infrastructure is pointed directly at 1-4% of the population at the whim of the top 10% of society for deeply held and completely fallacious beliefs to the annoyance and even detriment of nearly everyone else⁴.

So, we as a society are primed to believe that if any exception exists, or even a plausible fiction describing a possible exception, then the whole of law, process, conduct, and culture needs to be revised to balance out any potential unfairnesses. And this exploit has been leveraged to create, popularize, then mythologize “stunning & brave women” who “shattered the glass ceiling” to “soar among the stars.” This methodology is easily observable by looking at public school curricula regarding one of the “greatest scientists” of American history being… George Washington Carver.⁵ The mythos surrounding Carver is easily demystified by anyone who can read at a 6th grade level, but the intellectual defenses surrounding the Stunning & Brave Ladies of Herstory are a bit more formidable.

If you are ever in search of a deluge of unfettered abuse and hatred, go on any online forum and challenge the presumptions surrounding…

Helen Keller

This one is nothing but hilarious to me because it is maybe the most blatant example of Point Deer, Make Horse in modern history. We are told that a little girl that can neither see nor hear has her hand run under some water by a stunning & brave spinster⁶ which catapults her into a high IQ whirlwind of erudite brilliance. Go back and read the myth again, then spend ten minutes thinking about the mechanics of constructing a complete sensory reality one concept at a time starting from a complete VOID. Either she was a deaf-blind woman with some very exploitative acquaintances, or her affliction was massively overstated; there is no middle ground on this one.

How often do the blind tell people they “see” something? Honest inquiry.

I think she was just a bit dumb and hard of hearing. I bet she had a pair of really ugly coke bottle glasses and refused to let that keep her from becoming the belle of the ball and, given that she was also a frumpy dump, she had no choice but to construct an elaborate backstory of massive adversity overcome by sheer determination. As unbelievable as that may sound, let us never forget what some women are willing to do to get the attention they feel they deserve⁷.

Why This Matters

Laughing at silly women that demand you take their fantasies seriously is healthy and productive. If women want to be taken seriously outside of their natural domain then they need to come correct, and they never do. Pantsuit pretenders always get a leg up from men who are incapable of competing with their more successful counterparts. Weaponized Feminism (Waves 1 - n) is always a conspiracy between Spinsters and Betas to attack the Alpha Hierarchy by destroying organic femininity⁸. It is easy to see now with the shitty multicolored haircuts & corpulent spokes-hoes, but it is important to understand that all forms of Feminism are bad ideas that hurt women, handicap men, and make our Society less beautiful, capable, and stable.

Anything that tries to get people to act in defiance of Nature needs to be challenged judiciously and forced to explain how it is a good idea for the most people, most of the time, through time, for as long as possible. If the justification is “I watched a movie and it seemed kinda sad how the ladies playing dress up as actresses were treated by fictional characters” or anything remotely similar, then the whole memeplex needs to be chucked into the used tampon pile of history.

A more tactical utility of recognizing the One Hit Wonder-Women phenomenon is that it is always a conspiracy to disrupt order. We have arrived at the point that anyone using these One Hit Wonder-Women, or any other pet minority caricatures for that matter, is best treated as an adversarial agent. They may be a useful idiot or they may be ignorant, but they also may be an Entryist, a subversive entity seeking to gain access to the hearts and minds of a community with the explicit intention of changing the group, organization, or identity. It doesn’t matter if it is a pastor, a boss, an acquaintance, or a *wretch* take-seller, if they are deploying feminist dogma, they are doing damage, and the only real question is “why?”

Sacred cows are critical spiritual livestock for any regime. Every society has sacred cows, they are the reverse side of the coin of devotion. It is not enough to hold something in high esteem, there must be a commensurate penalty for anyone who would disrespect it. But not all livestock is created equal. If they are valuable and powerful, they unite people and help define the boundaries of what is acceptable. If they are cheap and weak, they are a constant target for ridicule, both internally and externally, meaning resources are wasted on silencing derision and fabricating the artifacts of legend.

1. I haven’t really dug into who the actual editor was, but maybe you should because it might turn out to be quite (((humorous)))

2. I started writing this essay in March or April (I am really bad at this lmao), and in the intervening time, I heard in a Spaces the idea that Truman Capote is the actual author of TKAM. I am genuinely curious to hear more on this if there is veracity to the claim.

3. Normal, healthy, well-adjusted people always believe the opposite of Dwight K. Schrute. Rainn Wilson performed quite the mitzvah, destroying any real chance at acting in different stories with any appreciable believability, just to embody a cautionary tale to help White Men Get It Right. Just a standup guy all around, and not at all a vessel for daemonic forces intent on erasing Us. Of this we can be sure.

4. I will be posting an essay in the near future more focused on this topic. Stay tuned… or don’t, I am the Thot Police, not Thought Police. UPDATE: I did it. Read here:

5. Nothing. He did nothing notable. He is outclassed by hundreds of men whose names you will never be told in public school. And while we are here, peanut butter was invented by the Aztecs. If you look up Carver, you will find scores of webpages that gush over his “300 peanut based inventions,” which all boil down to “using peanuts for stuff.” So one of the “greatest American scientists” played with fucking legumes a bit, and flight, medicine, computers, and chemistry is just a bunch of other extraneous stuff. Utterly shambolic.

6. There were A LOT of these types running around back then, and while I am not going to point fingers at this point, I think we protestant Americans MIGHT have a bit of ‘splaining to do…

7. Interesting Note: here is a fun little la wik page worth scrolling through for a laugh. Seems like it is quite often the vaginal side of life that likes to play pretend. Who knew.

8. In the parlance of current era: Feminism is a conspiracy between Billy Beta and Stephanie Sexless to destroy Chad Thundercock by ruining Stacy Sexnpoise.